wrong decision of the NRL. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had
agitated the aforementioned issue and sought for refund of the security deposit ... extended to 28.05.2023.
7.6. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had agitated the aforementioned issue and
Page No.# 12/60
sought for refund
wrong decision of the NRL. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had
agitated the aforementioned issue and sought for refund of the security deposit ... extended to 28.05.2023.
7.6. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had agitated the aforementioned issue and
Page No.# 12/60
sought for refund
wrong decision of the NRL. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had
agitated the aforementioned issue and sought for refund of the security deposit ... extended to 28.05.2023.
7.6. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had agitated the aforementioned issue and
Page No.# 12/60
sought for refund
wrong decision of the NRL. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had
agitated the aforementioned issue and sought for refund of the security deposit ... extended to 28.05.2023.
7.6. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had agitated the aforementioned issue and
Page No.# 12/60
sought for refund
wrong decision of the NRL. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had
agitated the aforementioned issue and sought for refund of the security deposit ... extended to 28.05.2023.
7.6. The petitioner vide email dated 24.04.2023 had agitated the aforementioned issue and
Page No.# 12/60
sought for refund
incident happens on 19-10-2017. The
incident is a railway roko agitation programme
organized by political and of daily travelers
organization demanding retention ... people in and around KGF. Due to the railway
roko agitation for 65 minutes the trains could
not pass through the tracks. This resulted
maintainable, since
the grounds of challenge raised hereby have already been agitated by
the petitioners by way of an earlier writ petition bearing ... that a second writ petition
based on the same facts and agitating the same cause of action is not
maintainable. It is further submitted that
removal of Minister(s) on fault grounds
and therefore, resorting to public agitation for that
purpose does not amount to a culpable act, much less ... merit interference for the
following reasons:
1. AS TO RIGHT OF AGITATION BEING A
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT:
(a) Our Constitution vide Article 19(1) guarantees
removal of Minister(s) on fault grounds
and therefore, resorting to public agitation for that
purpose does not amount to a culpable act, much less ... merit interference for the
following reasons:
1. AS TO RIGHT OF AGITATION BEING A
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT:
(a) Our Constitution vide Article 19(1) guarantees
removal of Minister(s) on fault grounds
and therefore, resorting to public agitation for that
purpose does not amount to a culpable act, much less ... merit interference for the
following reasons:
1. AS TO RIGHT OF AGITATION BEING A
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT:
(a) Our Constitution vide Article 19(1) guarantees
