guilt against the appellants:
(i) the place of incident (who were the agressors, whether complainant party or the accused persons) ;
(ii) What was the genesis ... also be concluded that the members of the complainant party were the agressors. In that view of the matter, the question which now emerges
prosecution, a firm finding can be recorded that the accused was the agressor, there would be no difficulty in recording conviction of Swaran Singh under ... possible to give a firm finding that the prosecution witnesses were the agressors, the plea of the accused that they acted in exercise
them have mentioned that infact,
the complainant and his relatives were agressors and they attacked them and
inflicted injuries upon them. They have put forward ... forward a version
that the complainant and his relatives were the agressors who assaulted them.
The DD entry no. 19 B was an important
injured witness also. She has said that the accused were agressors
10. PW 5, Sri Rabmatullah Shan alias Tulla is also a witnes of fact
would be liable to be bound down....The agressor himself cannot ask the other party to be bound down to enable its object
incident. Thus it is conclusively proved that the accused were
the agressor and caused injuries to Surjit Singh on his head with a sharp
weapon
accused party acted in self defendant, or that accused were not agressors.
19. In view of what we have discussed about the circumstances ... them. It is clear that the accused persons were the agressors.
20. So the facts and circumstances of the present case have to be kept
setting aside his order of acquittal held that the appellants were the agressors, that the incident took place inside the field of Hirday Rai, that
held that "right of self-defence does not extend to the agressor who retaliates to the act of self-defence of the victim
testified. This would indicate that P.Ws. 1 to 3 are the agressors and the settled possession of the land remained only with the appellants
