K Sridaran vs Indian Bank on 25 April, 2022
local police station and the information was crucial in order
to prove his alibi, i.e. the CCTV footage of the bank premises
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 204 (0.85 seconds)Deepak Kumar Acharya vs Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... on 16 December, 2019
Court, Angul which was used as an alibi to
involve the IT authorities allegedly in order to prove his bonafide in the matter.
The Commission
Ved Singh Malik vs Comm. Of Police on 7 October, 2016
accused despite serious allegations by virtue of the
flimsy plea of alibi taken by the accused, thereby missing the
vital scientific evidence. Insprs. Satya ... favour of Arif to prove his flimsy alibi.
It was also alleged against the aforesaid delinquents that
prosecutrix Shamim visited PS Seelam Pur several times
Cedan Vinmay (P) Ltd. vs Asstt. Cit on 10 December, 2001
entire expenses. In a criminal case when an alibi is taken as a defence which is proved to be wrong by the prosecution, the burden
Shree Arbuda Jewellers, Palanpur vs Assessee on 11 July, 2014
assessee to prove the same. Therefore, it is clear that the affidavits
have been made and submitted only to give an alibi to the assessee ... jewellery.
As it has been proved earlier that the payment of labour has been shown
only to create an alibi of excess stock, the same
Dwarkes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.,, ... vs Dcit, Circle-1(1)(2),, Ahmedabad on 10 December, 2020
cross
examination of the labour contractors which clearly proved that the assessee has made
them an alibi to inflate the expenditure in the form
Vivekananda Gupta (Director) vs Swapan Sarkar on 16 May, 2017
furnished on record. We afraid, unsubstantiated claim does not prove anything.
Another alibi cited is alleged infirm condition of the Appellant
C K Chavan vs D/O Post on 3 September, 2018
apparent on
you the burden of proving it, once you have made it, to prove it as an
adverse perception has to be a necessary ... what will be status of the technical lacune ?
The admission and the alibi which was unable to be proven by the
applicant had created new relevance
Shri Dinesh Sharma & Ors. vs Shri Atul M Nadar on 23 July, 2013
possession of the Appellants of the said
land. This proves that the alibi taken
by the Opponent for not constructing the building is not correct
Prasanta Kumar Paul vs Tata Motors Ltd. on 18 August, 2017
hilly area has not been proved by producing any documents or evidence. Such an alibi as taken by the OP herein cannot be said ... allegations by the complainants, the OPs have not only been admitted but proved by the documents produced on their behalf as referred to earlier