Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 880 (1.10 seconds)

Sundar Lal vs State on 12 January, 2018

denied the case of the prosecution. He has taken the plea of alibi. The appellant was convicted and sentenced, as noticed hereinabove. Hence, the present ... appellant has vehemently argued that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant. Learned counsel appearing on behalf
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 119 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document

5 vs . on 25 November, 2014

these circumstances, the prosecution has not been able to prove that mobile No. 9899798669 which according to the prosecution belonged to Saroj wife of Pushpender ... have committed the murder of Meena. 63. In order to prove his alibi accused Ravinder examined Jaswant as DW 4 who deposed that
Delhi District Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . : Dinesh Kumar on 24 May, 2010

plea of alibi of accused Harvinder is well established from the evidence of PW4 and 7. Plea of alibi was rather proved by IO / PW10 ... Prosecution in proving of the guilt of the accused and the evidence adduced by the accused in proving his defense of alibi. If the evidence
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 1 March, 2012

till the time she reached the hospital. 73. The onus to prove alibi is on the person who pleads alibi. The defence has been raised ... circumstances of this case. The accused, therefore, has failed to prove alibi. 81. So keeping in view the entire facts and circumstances
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ajeet Singh @ Babbe Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 August, 2014

case.     It   was   expected   from   the   appellant   Rajeev   Lochan Singh   to   prove   his   alibi   with   documentary   evidence   of unimpeachable   veracity,   whereas   he   has   examined ... evidentiary   value.     It   was   for   the   appellant   Rajeev   Lochan Singh to prove his alibi that he was not in a position to come from   Piparjhar
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 16 - N K Gupta - Full Document

Satya Vir vs State on 25 September, 1957

ground. Four defence witnesses were produced to prove certain documents and four were produced to prove alibi. 12. Now, where an alleged offence has been ... alibi was, however, produced although, consisting, as it would have, of official records, it afforded the appellant the best means of proving his plea
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 7 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next