effect of
statutory presumption as envisaged under Section 16 of the Hindu
Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. For convenience sake it
would be worthwhile ... reads as below:
"16. Presumption as to registered documents
relating to adoption. Whenever any document
registered under any law for the time being
that he must not give his son Raghunath, aged 8 years,
in adoption to Smt. Laxmibai.
C. On 10.5.1971, some of the respondents herein, filed ... Bhagwant Pandav, Smt. Laxmibai and
Smt. Gopikabai, restraining them from effectuating the adoption of
Raghunath. The aforementioned suit was withdrawn subsequently, in
September
learned counsel appearing for the appellant. According to
him, there was no adoption of the respondent by the adoptive
father as alleged and secondly, since ... more
than 15 years of age on the date of the alleged adoption, he
could not have been validly adopted without proving any
customs
adopted son on the basis of a deed of adoption dated 28-2-1989. It is said to have been executed seven months before ... basis of a presumption relating to the validity of the adoption deed under Section 16 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Under Section
aforesaid Smt Phulla on the basis of a registered deed of adoption dated 24-6-1967. It may be mentioned that Smt Phulla ... opinion that on the basis of the deed of adoption the respondent can claim substitution in place of Smt Phulla. Against that order the present
petitioner should be allowed to assert his right as per the Adoption Deed dated 7th April 2000 or not.
4. The short facts ... identified as Trivedi Nayankumar Rajnikaben. The petitioner was adopted by registered Adoption Deed dated 7th April 2000 and it is the case of the petitioner
admittedly belonged to Udit, on the basis of a registered deed of adoption dated 27-6-1972. That claim was resisted by the respondent Sita ... materials on record came to the conclusion that although the deed of adoption had been executed, but in fact, the appellant had not been adopted
proper giving and taking of the boy
according to sastras. Evidencing the adoption, a registered deed was executed
and as per the same ... power of attorney deed on 17-7-84, after the adoption of first plaintiff on
18-8-84, in favour of the first plaintiff
that Harkesh was not the adopted son of Smt. Hanso as no adoption took place. It was next averred that ... first contention of Mr. Jawanda is that the original registered deed of adoption has not been produced and the plaintiff-respondent did not make
Patel. It is stated that before
the Sub Registrar, Mehsana, a registered adoption deed
dated 24.03.2015 came to be executed being
registration ... averred that ceremony and
rites for adoption were carried out on 17.02.2015 in
the presence of family members whereafter the adoption
deed was executed
