State Of U.P vs Allied Constructions on 31 July, 2003
Equivalent citations: AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT ... Appeal (civil) 14152 of 1996
PETITIONER:
STATE OF U.P.
RESPONDENT:
ALLIED CONSTRUCTIONS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/07/2003
BENCH:
V.N. KHARE
been once again reiterated in State of U.P. v. Allied Constructions , that Section 30 of the said Act provides for setting aside an award ... judgment of the Apex Court in State of U.P. v. Allied Constructions 's case (supra) where it was observed as under
Housing Board , Haryana and Others[2],
State of U.P. v. Allied Constructions [3], State Bank of India v. Ram Das
and Another ... regards
the scope of Section 30 of the 1940 Act. In Allied Constructions (supra),
a three-Judge Bench after referring to earlier judgments has opined
State of U.P. vs. Allied Constructions (2003) 7 SCC 396). i. Pure Helium India (P) Ltd. vs. Oil & Natural Gas Commission ... Apex Court in State of U.P. vs. Allied Constructions (2003) 7 SCC 396), has laid down as under:-
4. Any award made
case of State of U.P. Vs.
Allied Constructions )
V. AIR 2007 (NOC) 381 (Mad) (in the case of
N.Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. The Southern ... case of State of U.P. Vs.
Allied Constructions )
III. AIR 1991 SC 945 (in the case of S.Harcharan Singh
Vs. Union of India
situation whereby, land that has been under paddy farming and its allied constructions like drainage channels, ponds, canals, bunds and ridges ... paddy cultivation but uncultivated and left fallow, and includes its allied constructions like bunds, drainage channels, ponds and canals; (xiii) "Padasekhara Samithi" means an organisation
Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006
Equivalent
CASE LAWS ON THE POINT :
In State of U.P. vs. Allied Constructions [2003 (6) SCALE 265],
this Court held :
"...Interpretation of a contract
paddy, cultivation but uncultivated and
left fallow, and includes its allied constructions like bunds,
drainage channels, ponds and canals".
The emphasis, hence
Kerala ( 1989) 2
SCC 38 and State of U.P. vs. Allied Constructions
(2003) 7 SCC 396].
20. In the present case, on the material
