this appeal with the observation
that the appellant, if not already regularised as Headmaster, shall
be considered for regularization w.e.f. the date
this appeal with the observation that
the appellant, if not already regularised as Headmaster, shall be
considered for regularisation w.e.f. the date
Resolution dated 23.10.1987
also reveals decision of the State Government for regularising such employees
in work charged establishment who completed five years of continuous
satisfactory ... There cannot be class amongst class. The services of
the petitioner already regularised, cannot be treated differently, it amounts to
discrimination and as such, violative
this appeal with the
observation that the appellant, if not already regularised as
Headmaster, shall be considered for regularisation w.e.f. the
date
appeal with an observation that the appellant if not already
regularised as Headmaster shall be considered for regularisation w.e.f.
the date on which
here that in view of
the fact that his services were already regularised w.e.f.
01.04.1977 vide letter no. 616 dated 05.04.1986 (Annexure
pending cases, petitioners are seeking mandamus
commanding the State authorities to regularise their services, since they
are working for 10-20-25 years.
In some ... petitioners are asserting that some of their similarly
situated colleagues have already been regularised under the office order/
circular issued by respective Departments, while petitioners
learned counsel for the respondent Corporation that the
Corporation had already decided to regularize the services of the petitioners
and to that effect, the statement ... petitioner has submitted that since the
services of the petitioners had already been regularised by the respondent
Corporation in its 36th Meeting of the Board
committee to take a decision on regularisation, after a decision
has already been taken, does not appeal to reason.
20. The next issue ... call for interference
at this late stage when those appointed or regularised
have already started retiring having served their
respective departments, in some cases
committee to take a decision on regularisation, after a decision
has already been taken, does not appeal to reason.
20. The next issue ... call for interference
at this late stage when those appointed or regularised
have already started retiring having served their
respective departments, in some cases
