they fulfil them, their services have to be regularised. If such an
exercise has already been undertaken by ignoring or omitting
the cases of Respondents ... Constitution. Having said so, this Court did not upset the
regularisations that had already taken place, regardless of whether
such regularisations related to illegal
already been extended.
// 2 //
4. Mr. S.C. Rath, learned counsel for the University
also contended that services of the petitioners have
already been regularised
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice,
need not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill them, their services have to
be regularised. If such an exercise has already been
undertaken by ignoring or omitting the cases of
Respondents
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice,
need not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill them, their services
have to be regularised. If such an exercise has
already been undertaken by ignoring or omitting
the cases of Respondents
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice,
need not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill them, their services have to
be regularised. If such an exercise has already been
undertaken by ignoring or omitting the cases of
Respondents
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice,
need not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill them, their services
have to be regularised. If such an exercise has
already been undertaken by ignoring or omitting
the cases of Respondents
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice,
need not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill them, their services have to
be regularised. If such an exercise has already been
undertaken by ignoring or omitting the cases of
Page
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice, need
not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill
them, their services have to be regularised. If such
an exercise has already been undertaken by
ignoring or omitting the cases of Respondents
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice, need
not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill
them, their services have to be regularised. If such
an exercise has already been undertaken by
ignoring or omitting the cases of Respondents
months from this date. We also clarify that
regularisation, if any already made, but not subjudice,
need not be reopened based on this judgement ... they fulfill them, their services have to
be regularised. If such an exercise has already been
undertaken by ignoring or omitting the cases of
Respondents
