their services were regularised. Granting regularisation itself
was a concession extended by the Government. When the writ
petitioners had already enjoyed the concession, they cannot ... matter of regularisation and permanent absorption, the writ
petitioners were already regularised with effect from 28.08.2007
and therefore, they are not entitled for any retrospective
Department as daily rated employee and therefore, he
is entitled to be regularised in the permanent post of Technical Assistant or
at least ... were considered by the Department and some of the persons were already
regularised in the permanent post. In this regard, the Writ Petitioner has
already
Department as
daily rated employee and therefore, he is entitled to be regularised in the
permanent post of Technical Assistant or at least ... were considered by the Department
and some of the persons were already regularised in the permanent post. In
this regard, the Writ Petitioner has already
Department as daily rated employee and therefore, he
is entitled to be regularised in the permanent post of Technical Assistant or
at least ... were considered by the Department and some of the persons were already
regularised in the permanent post. In this regard, the Writ Petitioner has
already
process can be regularised backdoor entries appointment contrary to the
constitutional scheme and those appointment of ineligible candidates
cannot be regularises. ”
http://www.judis ... benefit of regularisation
was already granted by proceedings dated 01.03.2006 and the service of
the writ petitioner was already regularised and he is working
process can be regularised backdoor entries appointment contrary to the
constitutional scheme and those appointment of ineligible candidates
cannot be regularises. ”
http://www.judis ... benefit of regularisation
was already granted by proceedings dated 01.03.2006 and the service of
the writ petitioner was already regularised and he is working
process can be regularised backdoor entries appointment contrary to the
constitutional scheme and those appointment of ineligible candidates
cannot be regularises. ”
http://www.judis ... benefit of regularisation
was already granted by proceedings dated 01.03.2006 and the service of
the writ petitioner was already regularised and he is working
regularised with effect
from 25.05.2003 on completion of 3 years of services as consolidated pay
employee. However, the services of the writ petitioners were regularised ... behalf of the third respondent states that the writ
petitioners were already regularised with effect from 23.02.2006 and further
retrospective regularisation cannot be granted
regularised with effect
from 25.05.2003 on completion of 3 years of services as consolidated pay
employee. However, the services of the writ petitioners were regularised ... behalf of the third respondent states that the writ
petitioners were already regularised with effect from 23.02.2006 and further
retrospective regularisation cannot be granted
this Court that the services of the fifth
respondent was already regularised and rules in respect of the age limit was
also relaxed
