plaintiff filed
application dated 29.10.2007 and, as per the order dated 24.10.2007,
submitted amended plaint and amended application for interim
injunction and other reliefs ... Order No.
70 of 2010, the plaint was amended and the injunction as prayed for
below application Exh.137 is granted in favour
permanent injunction. Since the plaintiffs had failed in their attempt to execute the sale deed in their favour, they sought to amend the plaint ... originally filed a suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction and later on, took out an application under Order VI Rule
higher rate and therefore,
the suit for permanent injunction was filed in which temporary injunction
was granted by the Court on 16.4.2003.
In the written ... amend the suit from permanent
injunction to a suit for specific performance on 20.9.2005 and during the
pendency of the said application, filed a separate
assigns (Amended
as per order dated 12.04.2010 in Application No.6723 of 2010)
(b) Permanent injunction restraining the defendant Nos.3 to 7 whether ... Royalty Agreement both dated
26th October 1988 (Amended as per order dated 12.04.2010 in
Application No.6723 of 2010)
(c) Costs
Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, an application to amend the plaint with the relief of mandatory injunction.
2. Heard the submissions ... relief of inclusion of prayer of mandatory injunction is not permitted by amending the plaint. At the same time, the right accrued to the respondents
During the pendency of the suit, the
application seeking permission to amend if
decree of mandatory injunction 'gro-iu
defendants had after filing
filed application to amend the
written statement to incorporate a counter claim for declaration of
his title and for injunction against petitioner. He also filed ... Writ Petition. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for
petitioner would contend that application to amend the written
statement to incorporate counter claim is highly belated
Petitioners are the plaintiffs in a suit for injunction.
They filed an application to amend the description
schedule. It appears that the obvious attempt
Munsiff insisted
on the petitioners to file a counter to the injunction
application on or before 08.10.2009 itself. They would
contend that even before ... plaintiff filed the
applications to amend the plaint schedule as well as the
schedule in the application for temporary injunction. Since
the interim injunction
Court has modified the order of temporary injunction after allowing the application filed by the petitioner for amending the plaint and impleading the non-petitioner
