aspect of boundaries D.Ws 2 to 5
were cross-examined and if the proposed amendment is allowed, by
changing the boundaries of the schedule ... evidence as D.Ws 1 and 2 and also on their side D.Ws 3, 4
and 5 examined and the plaintiff
challenge, contended that when the first
respondent failed to cross-examine P.Ws.1 and 2 and failed to
adduce evidence, the course open ... Ws.1
and 2 and the court observed that though the counsel for
respondents 1 and 6 received affidavits of P.Ws
contention of the learned counsel for the assessee is that although this amendment was introduced with retrospective effect and section ... assessment order ws made on 11th September, 1978. Thus both these orders were passed after the amendment came into force and when they were made
Indian Electricity Act as amended by the Indian Electricity (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000 is in question.
2. The petitioners who are running a flour ... Ws.1 to 4.
4. While the matter stood thus, on or about 28.9.2000, the State of Andhra Pradesh, however, brought an amendment
irreparable loss." This was only the pleading seeking for amendment of the provision of law. For this, a counter-affidavit has been filed ... sought for amendment, cannot be accepted. In the instant case, the pleadings and the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 show that the intention
amendment was now sought,
such an amendment application could not have been ordered at all.
Learned counsel would submit that after the amendment ... Ws.1
and 2 and to fill up the lacuna pointed out during the cross-
examination of those witnesses, the present amendment application
is moved
after the words "other elders". He has also asked for amendment of paragraph 3 of the written statement by introducing the words ... examined himself as P.W. 1 and five other witnesses as P.Ws. 2 to 6. According to them there was no oral gift announced
that the Court below was in error in rejecting the petition for amendment of the plaint and forcing the parties to file another suit ... lower appellate Court failed to consider in particular the evidence of P.Ws. 1 to 3 who speak to the possession of the plaintiff
side of the defendants D.Ws. 1 and 2 were examined and they also got marked certain documents ... arise in the case. It held that in view of the amendment of the plaint, showing M/s Dayal Wood Works represented by its partner
Chadalavada Subba Rao vs Kasu Brahmananda Reddy And Ors. on 13 December, 1965
Equivalent citations
