further been glisten with
specific identity by way of amendment of WS, and on that very
aspect, plaintiff, PW-39, was recalled to controvert ... theme
brought up by way of amendment in the WS.
7. It is also evident from the record that witnesses have
also been examined including
ORDER
1. This composite order will decide two applications, one for
amendment of WS U/o 6 Rule 17 dated 22.11.2014 and the other ... after eleven and half years of the filing of original WS and the
amendment proposes a U-turn from the defence. It is further
contended
amended on 7-8-1997 because of amendment to written
statement by Kumar Liquors. The amendment points out transfer of
Secunderabad Suit filed by Kumar ... Apex Court. They have pointed out that entire amendment to WS was
irrelevant. They have stated that Cruikshank and Company was having
independent status
amended on 7-8-1997 because of amendment to written
statement by Kumar Liquors. The amendment points out transfer of
Secunderabad Suit filed by Kumar ... Apex Court. They have pointed out that entire amendment to WS was
irrelevant. They have stated that Cruikshank and Company was having
independent status
amended on 7-8-1997 because of amendment to written
statement by Kumar Liquors. The amendment points out transfer of
Secunderabad Suit filed by Kumar ... Apex Court. They have pointed out that entire amendment to WS was
irrelevant. They have stated that Cruikshank and Company was having
independent status
appellant
moved an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for
amendment of WS. However, the same was stands dismissed
vide order dated
Page No. 12 of 19
Rekha Satija vs. Ashok
application seeking amendment in WS and the same cannot be
considered being beyond pleading but even
application of
the management for amendment of WS was allowed on 28.05.2004.
Vide amendment, the management incorporated a new fact about its
closure. Thereafter
fault on her part.
In my opinion the desired amendment in the WS would not
change the nature of defence taken by the defendant further ... been withdrawn by the defendant by way of the
present amendment in the WS and in my view no prejudice would
be caused
improper legal advise the WS of the defendants has not been
appropriately drafted and the defendants want to amend their WS.
3. I have heard ... evidence. The
defendants are given liberty to move application for amendment of WS
before Ld. Trial Court. Ld. Trial Court is directed to decide
