order dated 20th July, 2018),
1701/2019 (of D-1 seeking amendment of WS) & 1702/2019 (of D-4
seeking amendment of WS)
KAILASH ... have
thereafter filed IA No.1701/2019 and 1702/2019 for amendment of their
written statements. It is however the settled position in law, that
2016 & IAs No.1701/2019 (of D-1 for amendment of
WS) & 1702/2019 (of D-4 for amendment of WS)
KAILASH DEVI
amendment. It further appears that at the same time
the applicant-husband had filed an application seeking
amendment in the say/ws ... crirevn114.2005.odt
application seeking amendment in the say/ws came to
be rejected, subsequently, the applicant-husband has
filed an applications for adjournment
aside and the application for the amendment is allowed.
In case if the reply/WS has already been filed ... respondent, the
respondent shall be at liberty to seek amendment in the WS.
In view of aforesaid, the petition is allowed.
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)
JUDGE
entered their appearance through counsels and separate WS was also
filed on behalf of the defendant 1 & 2 and 4. Vide order dated ... behalf
of the defendant no. 1 and 2 was allowed for amendment of WS of
defendant no.1 and 2.
4. The case
issued to management for
15.02.2016. Management put appearance on 15.02.2016 and filed WS
and case was listed for rejoinder/framing of issues on 05.04.2016.
Issues ... under order 6
rule 17 read with section 151 CPC for amendment in WS. Same was
allowed on 15.11.2018 and case was listed for filing
that earlier a similar amendment was
allowed by this court in the year 2007 itself, but no
such amended WS was filed on behalf ... ought to file
amended WS within the above said period, but no such
WS was filed, due to the earlier amendment could not
take place
contention of learned senior counsel for
petitioner is that while allowing the amendment applications of
wife, objections raised by husband in express terms ... case was pending for filing of WS by the wife.
A bare perusal of the amendment application reveals that
certain better particulars in support
maintain annually. Subsequent to that
amendment order was issued vide G.O(D)
No.9511/MA&WS(MA3) Department, dated 11.02.2015, in
which
amendment, that too, after completion of examination of P.Ws.1 & 2.
The said amendment application was filed by the plaintiff, to include