suit cannot be
faulted. Exs.A.1 and A.6 are ancient documents. In view of Section 90 of the
Evidence Act, their validity cannot ... Sahib. It is more than 30 years old. It is an Ancient Document. In view
of Section 90 of the Indian Evidence
contesting respondents would submit that since Ex.B4 is an ancient document of 30 years old, it attracts the presumption contemplated under Section ... Evidence Act Squarely applies.
17. Admittedly Ex.B4 is an ancient document aged more than 30 years. It is dated 07.10.1950. It has also
briefly be set out thus:
(a) Ex.A2 is an ancient document as per the Indian Evidence Act and the description as found ... where on the one side, the plaintiffs would rely on the ancient document Ex.A2 and also Ex.A4 - the document
after observing that the document under Ex.B-1 is an ancient document standing in the name of the appellants' predecessor in title ... documents produced on both sides are analysed, it is clear that the documents produced on the side of the defendants are ancient and consistent with
were not parties, yet Ex.A2 is an ancient document, which contemplated such pathway. Normally, no one would venture to specify such a common
grievance in appeal about the way the trial proceeded."
Once a document, which is basically defective has been wrongly entertained ... stretch of imagination, it could be described or labelled as an ancient document. The plaintiff was enjoined to produce antecedent title deed to his sale
sale deed dated 16.10.1917, is an ancient document in favour of the ancestors of the plaintiffs and they had been in possession and enjoyment ... plaintiffs' title is based on Ex.A1-an ancient document, there was no necessity for them to seek for declaration of title
dubbed as bonafide purchasers for value, because, on seeing the ancient documents, they ought to have made enquiries and found out as to whether ... Those documents could rightly be termed as ancient documents as well as anti litem motem documents; which emerged at a time when this dispute
Wakf Board of Dargah also rely on
these documents as well as three comparatively recent documents, which are the
Government Memoranda/correspondence between the Secretaries ... contemporaneous circumstances and the contextual events of the period when
the ancient documents came into existence (may be by oral evidence or by other
documents
lower appellate Court that the said document being an ancient document should be presumed to be genuine. At the cost of repetition, it is pointed
