interrogatories when delivered shall have a note at the foot
thereof stating which of such interrogatories each of such
persons is required to answer:
Provided ... answered on the
ground of privilege etc., in answer. The court then may
consider and dispose of the Interrogatories. It will not for the
court
actual if that is either in the pleadings or in answer to
interrogatories or implied from the pleadings by non-traversal.
Secondly as between parties ... proceed in respect of vague
and evasive pleadings, is best answered by the observations of a Division
Bench of this court in the case
case in the shape of the
applications under that Rule and the answering affidavit which
clearly reiterates the admission. If that is so, interpretation ... actual if that is either in the pleadings or in
answer to interrogatories or implied from the pleadings by non-
traversal. Secondly as between parties
admissions consist of facts expressly
admitted either in pleadings or in answer to interrogatories. In a
suit for ejectment, the factors which deserves
admissions consist of facts expressly admitted either in
pleadings or in answer to interrogatories.
12. Keeping in view the above legal position the issue would
then pass
appropriate orders.
73. Discovery and production of documents and answers to
interrogatories, together with an approach of considering what
in ordinary course
inferred from the vague and evasive
denial in the written statement while answering specific pleas
raised by the plaintiff. The admissions can even be inferred ... admissions consist of facts expressly admitted either in pleadings
or in answer to interrogatories. In a suit for ejectment, the factors
which deserves
1082/2014 Page 8 of 27
18. From the answers to the interrogatories furnished to the witnesses of Air
India, the AT noted that according
Rules 1 and 2 CPC to serve the interrogatories to defendant No.1 to
give the answer thereof as raised by the plaintiff in view ... directing
defendant No.1 to file the reply to the interrogatories by way of
affidavit. The said order was challenged by defendant
Chamber Appeal against the order dated
18th October, 2012 directing answering of the interrogatory is without
merit and is liable to be dismissed in view
