Therefore, the plaintiff is seeking directions to
the defendant to answer the questions/interrogatories as mentioned in
para 5 of the application and has also ... present
case. Hence, the defendant cannot be asked to answer the
interrogatories or produce the documents as prayed.
13. Though the plaintiff in her evidence
This court
granted one more opportunity to the plaintiff to answer the
interrogatories within 8 weeks vide its order dt. 12th September ... plaintiff is liable to be dismissed. The
plaintiff failed to answer the interrogatories in the period of 8 weeks
granted. The plaintiff failed the reply
admission consist of facts
expressly admitted either in pleadings or in
answer to interrogatories. In a suit for ejectment,
the factors which deserved
para 3 in the written statement
is clearly evasive and does not answer the point in
substance of the averment as given in the corresponding ... admissions consist of facts expressly admitted
either in pleadings or in answer to interrogatories. In
such a suit for ejectment, the factors which deserves
para 3 in the written statement is
clearly evasive and does not answer the point in substance of
the averment as given in the corresponding ... admissions consist of
facts expressly admitted either in pleadings or in answer to
interrogatories. In such a suit for ejectment, the factors which
deserves
admission
consist of facts expressly admitted either in pleadings or in answer
to interrogatories. In a suit for ejectment, the factors which
deserves
admissions consist of facts expressly admitted
either in pleadings or in answer to interrogatories. In
such a suit for ejectment, the factors which deserves
admission consist of facts
expressly admitted either in pleadings or in answer to interrogatories.
In a suit for ejectment, the factors which deserves
admission consist of facts expressly
admitted either in pleadings or in answer to interrogatories."
5. It is seen that the defendant/EDMC
record her original Pass Book of SBI as well as to answer certain
interrogatories. It may be noted that crossÂexamination of plaintiff has
already
