that case the defendant
had refused to answer the interrogatories of the plaintiff. His defence
was struck out. A judgment was given on that footing
that case the defendant
had refused to answer the interrogatories of the plaintiff. His defence
was struck out. A judgment was given on that footing
Privy Council 121 in which
upon the defendant having omitted to answer the interrogatories of the
plaintiff, the defence came to be struck
that case the defendant
had refused to answer the interrogatories of the plaintiff. His defence
was struck out. A judgment was given on that footing
then
pass appropriate orders.
73. Discovery and production of documents and
answers to interrogatories, together with an approach
of considering what in ordinary course
Royal Palms (India) Pvt. Ltd vs Neeta Jegnesh Parikh on 6 May, 2015
Author: R
