order, has allowed the IA
thereby directing the petitioner to answer the interrogatories
1 to 5, within 15 days. The said order is under challenge ... suit, or on the ground of
privilege. The use of the answers to interrogatories at the
trial is as mentioned in Order XI Rule
interrogatories. The petitioner/first
plaintiff however apprehends that the trial of the suit may
commence even before the documents are produced or the
interrogatories answered
leave for serving
interrogatories, as contemplated under Order XI Rule 1 of
Code of Civil Procedure . The interrogatories to be answered
which are mentioned ... date?"
The respondents objected the interim application by
contending that the answers could be sought during cross
examination and that the questions are irrelevant
petitioner has filed an application for
leave to serve interrogatories in the suit for
permanent prohibitory injunction. The petitioner
contends that the court below ... suit can be shaped only dependent on the answer to the
interrogatories served.
2. I direct the court of the Munsiff of
Perumbavoor to consider
JUDGMENT
I am not prepared to hold that the answers furnished to the
interrogatories served are wholly insufficient. The rest of the
things ... There is no justification in directing the petitioners to
answer further in regard to the interrogatories served as done by
the court below
also. It
seems that the tenant has filed applications for serving
interrogatories, for remanding the matter for adducing
further evidence etc.
5. The tenant ... proposed business of the son in the said
locality. PW1 answered in the negative. By harping upon
the said answer, it has been argued
