interrogatories were taken on record
after condoning the delay pursuant to the order below
application (Exhibit-118). Since the interrogatories have been
answered ... Court. Inadequacy or insufficiency of
answers cannot be equated with the non-compliance of the
order to answer interrogatories entailing consequences provided
in Rule
preferred this application seeking
a direction to defendant No. 1 to answer the interrogatories set out
in Exhibit A and to make disclosure on oath ... precluded from
calling upon the defendant No. 1 to answer the interrogatories and
produce the documents as the answers to the interrogatories and
the documents
page 285 (para 8)]. Admissions in answer to
interrogatories are also covered under this Rule [See
Mullas's commentary on the Code, 16th Edition
page 285 (para 8)]. Admissions in answer to
interrogatories are also covered under this Rule [See Mullas's
commentary on the Code, 16th Edition
page 285 (para
8)]. Admissions in answer to interrogatories are also
covered under this Rule [See Mullas's commentary on the
Code, 16th Edition
page 285 (para 8)]. Admissions in
answer to interrogatories are also covered under this Rule
[See Mullas's commentary on the Code, 16th Edition
Kamal Saroj
Mahajan3 SCC at p. 285, para 8). Admissions in answer to interrogatories
are also covered under this Rule (see Mullas's Commentary
Kamal Saroj
Mahajan3 SCC at p. 285, para 8). Admissions in answer to interrogatories
are also covered under this Rule (see Mullas's Commentary
that it has transpired that Mr.
Yadunath Ganesh Vaidya, who had answered the interrogatories
was not given power of attorney on behalf of the plaintiff
