Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Neetu Singh vs Telegram Fz Llc on 30 August, 2022 Author: Prathiba M. Singh Bench

This is an application filed by the Defendant No.1 seeking answer to interrogatories with respect to the jewellery items and other movable assets recovered ... interrogatories have been perused by the Court. Let all the Defendants answer these interrogatories and if any part of the information has been disclosed

present applications have been filed seeking directions to answer interrogatories. 6. The said applications are not pressed by the ld. counsel for the Plaintiff

shall follow in this regard. The defendants are further directed to answer the interrogatories served alongwith this application by filing an affidavit in terms ... application was merely for production of documents and not to answer interrogatories. She submits that insofar as the document at serial no.1 is concerned

relevant to the issue raised in the pleadings, the interrogatories are required to be answered. 12. The application of the Plaintiffs stands allowed. The defendants ... Accordingly, it is submitted that the direction to deliver the interrogatories and to answer the same is untenable in law. 8. On the other hand

application filed by the Plaintiffs seeking directions to the Defendants to answer the interrogatories as per I.A. 9977/2020 on an affidavit

Commercial Courts Act, 2015 seeking discovery by interrogatories and production of documents by the Defendants. The various interrogatories for the examination of the Defendants ... first use of the impugned marks till the present date. In answering this Interrogatory, please identify all persons with knowledge of the facts and circumstances

delivery of interrogatories of Defendant) 4. The reply to the interrogatories' application has been filed and as per Defendants they have answered the interrogatories

submits that his client is willing to answer the interrogatories attached to this application by way of an affidavit. 3. Ld. Counsel for the Defendant

done through hybrid conferencing. 2. The Court has perused the answers to the interrogatories given by the Defendant - Jonas Woodhead & Sons (India) Limited from ... Modi - MD of the Defendant Company. Having seen the answers given in response to the interrogatories, the following directions are issued: i. The Defendant shall