Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Hardip Kaur vs Kailash & Anr. on 18 May, 2012 Author: J.R. Midha Bench

Launder ; Launder v. Richards, (1908) WN 49 (J) ; (3) orders to answer interrogatories or for discovery or inspection of documents Little v. Roberts

Lucas seems to me to be demonstrably wrong. In his answers to Interrogatories on 26th May, 1918, (cf. also his evidence on the 18th July ... Lucas had admitted them in April in answer to Interrogatories, cross-examination on his behalf was of a fishing character. When the plaintiff Bank desired

that the 1st defendant has no case that the 3rd defendant answered the interrogatories in favour of the plaintiff on account of any collusion ... defendant and the plaintiff for which the 3rd defendant supported by answering the interrogatories. We, therefore, are of the firm view that there

Lucas seems to me to be demonstrably wrong. In his answers to interrogatories on 26th May 1918 (cf. also his evidence on the 18th July ... Lucas had admitted them in April in answer to interrogatories, cross-examination on his behalf was of a fishing character. When the plaintiff Bank desired

interrogatories when delivered shall have a note at the foot thereof stating which of such interrogatories each of such persons is required to answer: Provided ... document, however, in this case, the plaintiffs/respondents sought to answer interrogatories by the revision petitioners/defendants 1 to 4, who are parties

that the respondent bad filed application requiring the petitioner-herein to answer some interrogatories. In the objections filed in this court it had been contended ... these queries, they may do so on oath, A copy of the interrogatories was handed over to the claimants. It was also agreed that the claimants

message was mentioned in connection with the case was in the answers to interrogatories on the 27th January 1910 when the Deputy Traffic Manager deposed ... place. In re-examination the not was left untouched but in answer to the Court the witness lid: "I sent practice messages

such parties: (b) allegations made in the pleadings or in answers to interrogatories delivered in the suit; and (c) the contents of documents produced

stormy wind. But when the plaintiff called upon the defendants to answer such interrogatories in this matter, the defendants denied knowledge as to whether when