COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT IN OS NO.12/2002 UPON ANSWERING
INTERROGATORIES WITH RESPECT TO ANOTHER CHURCH IN IA NO.3826/2015
DATED 08.02.2018
RESPONDENTS
willfully
MFA 5339/2018
5
withholding information by refusing to answer
interrogatories or by withholding the
documents which he ought to discover. In such
been rejected. The petitioner
(original plaintiff) had filed these applications, seeking answer on
interrogatories and for discovery of documents from the
defendants/respondents ... Order XI of the
CPC , the respondents were bound to answer the interrogatories submitted
by the petitioner and to give discovery of documents on oath
interrogatories except interrogatory
numbers k to q, in which context objection was taken to the effect that
the said interrogatories were irrelevant, unreasonable, vexatious,
prolix ... Against this backdrop, question arose as to whether the order to
answer interrogatories had been duly complied with by the
petitioner/defendant
that such interrogatories have been exhibited unreasonably, vexatiously, or at improper length, the costs occasioned by the said interrogatories and the answers thereto shall ... made within seven days after service of the interrogatories. (8) Interrogatories shall be answered by affidavit to be filed within ten days, or within such
account of which, the
petitioner filed his application seeking answers to certain specified
interrogatories by the landlord.
3. But his application was rejected vide ... landlord, if he is directed to give categorical answers to only Interrogatories
No. 1 and 2 mentioned in the petitioner's impugned application
STRIKING OUT THE DEFENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS
FOR FAILURE TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES.
EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF I.A.4414/2016 BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL
Rent Cotroller, dismissing an
application for calling upon the respondent to answer interrogatories.
During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the parties
have reached ... consensus.
Learned counsel for the landlord has submitted that
interrogatories would be answered within ten days from the date of receipt
allowed to cross examine the expert by way of sending interrogatory, the
interrogatory was answered by the expert Dr. Veena Singh. Dr Veena
Singh clearly ... expert nowhere said that the doctor was negligent.
Based on the interrogatory answers by the expert the learned advocate
submitted that the expert Dr. Veena
evidence is filed he can be asked to answer the interrogatories to be delivered by the other party through the process of the State Commission ... State Commission. The respondent shall be at liberty to serve interrogatories to be answered by the surveyor."
3. It transpired during the course