Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

nature of seeking clarification/ opinion/answer to question/reply to a query which is interrogatory in nature which does not fall under the purview

para 5 it is submitted that the applicant has sought answer to an interrogatory query which is not covered under the definition of information under

seeking clarification or interrogatory or accusatory. The RTI Act does not cast on the Public Authority any obligation to answer queries, in which a petitioner

pressed for answers to her queries. It is relevant to mention here that information sought were interrogatory in nature and not covered

also entitles the candidates to seek inspection and certified copies of their answer scripts. In our opinion, the existence of these two avenues ... aforesaid ratio, the CPIO is under obligation to provide copy of answer scripts sought for under the RTI Act by charging photocopying charges strictly

Appellant. Further, the contents of RTI Application clearly reveal the interrogatory queries raised by the Appellant seeking clarifications which do not fall under the ambit ... adverting to Appellant's insistence seeking answers to his hypothetical queries, it shall be noted that the outstretching the interpretation of Section

able to answer along with the provisions/rules in the RTI Act, 2005 under which they are unable to provide answers. He also submitted that ... interrogatory and not covered u/s 2(f) of the RTI Act. Points no. 10-18 and 20-24 are queries in nature seeking answers

appellant in his second appeal submitted that reply doesn't answer the question directly. So his main query has not been addressed ... Commission observed that the information sought is in the nature of seeking answer and not covered

Syamraj R vs State Bank Of India on 1 September, 2023 Author: Saroj Punhani Bench

R Vidyadhar vs Department Of Personnel & Training on 21 September, 2023 Author: Saroj Punhani