appellants that not only the fardbeyan
but also other documents were antedated. The other
circumstances which we have taken into account after
looking
appellants that not only the fardbeyan
but also other documents were antedated. The other
circumstances which we have taken into account after
looking
evidence when he was cross-examined by stating that
there was no document testifying to the transaction of
money nor there was any witness ... written
report nor he had informed the police about the document
on account of the transaction indicated above. Thus, what
we find is that
evidence when he was cross-examined by stating that
there was no document testifying to the transaction of
money nor there was any witness ... written
report nor he had informed the police about the document
on account of the transaction indicated above. Thus, what
we find is that
evidence when he was cross-examined by stating that
there was no document testifying to the transaction of
money nor there was any witness ... written
report nor he had informed the police about the document
on account of the transaction indicated above. Thus, what
we find is that
Rajesh Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 14 August, 2013
Bench: Dharnidhar Jha , Pankaj
Shyam Lal Singh & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 19 August
Shiva Shankar Verma & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 19 August
Ram Pal Verma @ Ram Pal vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 19 August
Dr. Upendra Prasad Singh vs The State Of Bihar Through Vig on 19 August, 2011