true case.
If, therefore, Ext. 9 was found to be an antedated document brought into existence to support the case of the petitioner ... antedated and, in fact, that was the case of the petitioner in so far as he stated that the antedating was done, because the document
said to have been executed by defendant No. 3, is an antedated document prepared by defendant Nos. 1 and 2 after presentation of the sale ... defendants No. 1 and 2 executed by defendant No. 3 were antedated documents induced by threat and coercion to defendant No. 3 and are without
said that this sale deed is a fraudulent document and was brought into existence inspite of the aforesaid agreement executed by Md. Isa in favor ... filed by the plaintiff is a forged, fabricated and antedated document. Their further case is that Md. Isa had agreed to sell the house
defendant No. 1 which is an unregistered document and can be created at any- time by antedating the date of its execution. The abovementioned circumstances ... sale which is an unregistered document is a doubtful and antedated document.
22. It has been argued on behalf of the respondents that this Court
other hand, was that the offending leaflets were forged and antedated documents and had been printed and brought into existence at the Instance of respondent
suit property for Rs.50,000/-
on 12.02.1970?
(iv) Is the document of agreement dated
01.03.1970 as propounded by the plaintiff
genuine ... children under her signature? And are the
stamps of this document antedated?
(v) Whether plaintiff is possessed of the
sufficient means to purchase the suit
plaintiff and defendant no.1 dated
21.06.1962 is collusive, fraudulent and antedated document which is not binding
on the defendant. All other allegations were denied
plaintiff and defendant no.1 dated
21.06.1962 is collusive, fraudulent and antedated document which is not binding
on the defendant. All other allegations were denied
fact, the
written report of informant (PW-. 7) is an antedated document
and that was the reason the aforesaid written report was placed
before learned ... above stated delay of placing the F.I.R. and other
relevant documents before the court creates a serious doubt
Patna High Court
fact, the fard-e-beyan of P.W. 5 is a antedated document. He
submitted that P.W. 5 and P.W. 9 claimed that
