agenda for the meeting of 18.1.2002. Further, the accused No. 5 falsified documents by replacing the minutes of the Board meeting held ... collusion with the accused Nos. 2 to 6 fraudulently antedated documents by forging minutes of the meetings dated 27.5.2002, 27.8.2002, 16.9.2002, 14.12.2002 and 7.2.2003. Hence
antedating of a document with intent to commit fraud
is said to amount to forgery. Thus if the document is antedated it
will attract illustration ... document
will not attract the provisions of the said illustration. That in
the present case it is not the document which is antedated
claim produced several forged,
fabricated and antedated documents, which documents as
per the complaint averments are document Nos.2 to 7 as
mentioned in Para ... complainant that they were forged
fabricated, antedated and then the accused persons
produced those documents in the suit in order to defeat
the claim
created the
documents by forging the documents, creating fake seals
of the society and fabricated the documents. They have
also produced antedated false documents before ... Chairman, Secretary and members of the Society by
5
creating documents and antedated seals from the year
2005. They have used counterfeit seals
alleged that to usurp the property, the
accused has fabricated an antedated document (Retirement Deed from the
partnership firm dated 31.12.1993) by forging the signatures
false document as defined in
Section 464 IPC because neither was any signature forged nor was
the document antedated, etc. Thus apparently, the offences under
receipt of Rs.10 Lacs as earnest money was a
forged antedated document as the Stamp Paper was concededly issued on
31.05.2013.
The relevant portion
receipt of Rs.10 Lacs as
earnest money was a forged antedated document as the Stamp Paper was
concededly issued on 31.05.2013.
GUGNANI GAGANDEEP
notarized an agreement to sale which said to have been created
antedated documents for the purpose of using the same in judicial
process showing that ... facie
evidence on record that applicant was involved in notarizing the
antedated document without verifying the contents of document
therefore, we are of the view
agreement to sale between the petitioner and Lalita Sharma was
antedated document and the informant was not a party to the
suit.
4. Assuming that
