quite clear that plaintiff has already prepared
antedated documents Ex.P3 to establish his case
whereas, no consideration has exchange the hands
know that their cover was blown, they created
false and fabricated antedated documents such as Sale-Purchase Agreement
of the year 2015 to show sale ... know that they will get exposed,
they created false and fabricated antedated documents such as Sale-
Purchase Agreement to show sale of a fake entity
Company, is not a reliable document but it is an
antedated document. That apart, the said document rather supports the
case of Respondent
allow the plaintiffs to write
following statements, after the words antedated document
and full stop as follows:-
The alleged and so-called Donor named ... allow the plaintiffs to write following statements, after the words
antedated document and full stop as follows:
"The alleged and so-called Donor named
both antedated and ante-time. Therefore, it is
pointed out that the FIR Ex.P/2 is not a reliable document. Reading from ... concocted document or the FIR etc. are
antedated document. It is also pointed out that PW-10 has categorically
stated that on 04.12.1986 when
both antedated and ante-time. Therefore, it is
pointed out that the FIR Ex.P/2 is not a reliable document. Reading from ... concocted document or the FIR etc. are
antedated document. It is also pointed out that PW-10 has categorically
stated that on 04.12.1986 when
codeine mixture. It is argued the FIR is an
antedated document. In support of his plea, learned Advocate refers
to the formal part ... vehemently argues that this
aberration shows the FIR is an antedated and concocted document.
8. This Court is unable to accept the version
examination to Nasik as the same are forged and fabricated and antedated
documents. The learned counsel for the defendant-petitioner has further
contended that
concerned authority of the school are
not contemporary as document. Those documents were created
on 2nd of March, 2019 and 13th of December ... juvenile to the Juvenile Justice
Board. Since the petitioner filed two antedated documents
executed on 2nd of March, 2019 and 13th of February
received in the office of Respondents.
Moreover, the said documents is even different from
the document which was produced by the applicant
before this ... mislead the Hon'ble Court while placing on record
the antedated document which was never in
existence prior to the filing of the present