learned Division Bench took cognizance on July 29, strongly
suggests the document was antedated to cover up the retaliatory
motive. Moreover the documents submitted ... Division Bench took cognizance on July 29, strongly
suggests the document was antedated to cover up the retaliatory
motive. The action squarely falls within
inadvertent clerical error arising out of copy pasted standard office
format. The document in question was infact generated on 08.02.2024 for
facilitating registration ... signed by them only on 08.02.2024 and was not an
antedated document. They are not beneficiary to the alleged transaction.
They are simply employees
defendant at any point of time. The alleged document is a
fabricated and collusive document created by the 1 st defendant and the 2nd
defendant ... sale agreement dated 24.11.1986. The said document is a
motivated and antedated document. As the defendants tried to make
unnecessary claim in respect
favour
of the 1st defendant at any point of time. The alleged document is a
6/28
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded ... sale agreement dated 24.11.1986. The said document is a
motivated and antedated document. As the defendants tried to make
unnecessary claim in respect
further deprecated the conduct of the
plaintiff for fabricating and antedating documents
with a view to defeat the arbitration clause
embedded in the agreement ... that the
plaintiff itself had fabricated and antedated
certain documents to defeat the arbitration clause
and had its conduct deprecated by the learned
Civil Court
further deprecated the conduct of the
plaintiff for fabricating and antedating documents
with a view to defeat the arbitration clause
embedded in the agreement ... that the
plaintiff itself had fabricated and antedated
certain documents to defeat the arbitration clause
and had its conduct deprecated by the learned
Civil Court
further deprecated the conduct of the
plaintiff for fabricating and antedating documents
with a view to defeat the arbitration clause
embedded in the agreement ... that the
plaintiff itself had fabricated and antedated
certain documents to defeat the arbitration clause
and had its conduct deprecated by the learned
Civil Court
Therefore, Ex. D-2 is an
antedated document prepared by the Investigation Officer of the case Shri
A.H. Rizvi, Dy. Superintendent of Police. This
Therefore, Ex. D-2 is an
antedated document prepared by the Investigation Officer of the case Shri
A.H. Rizvi, Dy. Superintendent of Police. This
Therefore, Ex. D-2 is an
antedated document prepared by the Investigation Officer of the case Shri
A.H. Rizvi, Dy. Superintendent of Police. This
