Durlabhji Popatbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 13 July, 2018
Author: G.R.Udhwani
same. The procedure for laying a trap and use of anthracene powder
was explained to the complainant. Dy.S.P. had recorded the Pre-trap ... which is at exhibit 39. he was apprised of the use of
anthracene powder. Pre-trap Panchanama was recorded. He was given
specific instructions
same. The procedure for laying a trap and use of anthracene powder
was explained to the complainant. Dy.S.P. had recorded the Pre-trap ... which is at exhibit 39. he was apprised of the use of
anthracene powder. Pre-trap Panchanama was recorded. He was given
specific instructions
them about the
complaint, so also they were shown the use of
anthracene powder. Amount of Rs.1500/- was
taken from the complainant
also come on record that
instead of phenolphalein, anthracene powder was used, for which no
explanation has come from the prosecution. Moreover, there are
serious
money was falsified by the fact that
no anthracene powder, with which the notes used in the raid
were smeared, was found ... Ghanshamsinh for use in
the trapping the accused persons in the act of taking the
bribe. The notes were smeared with anthracene powder and
Ghanshamsinh
prove demand and
acceptance beyond reasonable doubt. Apart from that anthracene powder
has been used on the currency notes instead of phenolphthalein power
Ghanshamsinh for use in the trapping the accused persons in the act of taking the bribe. The notes were smeared with anthracene powder and Ghansham
that the accused had apprehended him and that the accused used his discretion for purposes of giving him an opportunity of paying up the penalty ... from the complainant. He stated that even assuming without admitting that anthracene powder was found on the hands of the accused, it would
learned Advocate for the appellant, there is contradiction to the extent of using this phraseology of bringing of bribe by panch ... which may affect the prosecution case in respect of experiment of anthracene powder. It is submitted that there is grave lacuna in prosecution case