SIMILARITY AND DISTINCTIVENESS - 58
NAME, COLOUR SCHEME, AND TRADE
DRESS
(B) ANTI-DISSECTION RULE 62
(C) DOMINANT FEATURE TEST 65
(D)NO EXCLUSIVE RIGHT OVER ... dissected the mark
‘BLENDERS PRIDE’ and compared “BLENDERS” with “LONDON”, ignoring
the distinctive and dominant component “PRIDE” – thus violating both the anti-
dissection rule
Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978
Equivalent citations: 1978 AIR 597
State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu@ Afsan Guru on 4 August, 2005
Mafatlal Industries Ltd. And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 19 December
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 25 January, 1978
Equivalent
Navtej Singh Johar vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law And ... on 6 September, 2018
Smt. Nilabati Behera Alias Lalit Behera ... vs State Of Orissa And Ors on 24 March
Shreya Singhal vs U.O.I on 24 March, 2015
Equivalent citations: AIR 2015 SUPREME
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India on 16 October, 2015
Author: Jagdish
Mukesh & Anr vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017
