Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 190 (0.65 seconds)

Shri P.S. Pruthi vs Union Of India Through on 7 February, 2013

valid for one year (calculated on the basis of number of anticipated vacancies x 1.5 rounded to nearest whole number) will be prepared. After ... vacancies on 31.05.2010, one vacancy on 31.12.2010; two vacancies on 28.02.2011 and one vacancy on 31.03.2011) on account of vacancies arising of various superannuation taking
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sudeepti Sharma vs State Of Punjab & Others on 19 August, 2013

Judicial Services, the High Court was not taken into consideration the anticipated vacancies. Had the anticipated vacancies taken into consideration, the General category candidates could ... arguments is that the High Court has not taken into consideration anticipated vacancies while issuing advertisement for filling up 21 posts of Punjab Superior Judicial
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next