Apar Limited vs Collector Of Central Excise And Customs on 13 April, 1992
Equivalent citations: 1992(61)ELT742(TRI-MUMBAI)
ORDER
R. Jayaraman, Member
Apar Industries Ltd., Korea Kumho ... vs Designated Authority, Ministry Of ... on 22 September, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006(113)ECC601, 2006ECR601(TRI.-DELHI), 2006(204)ELT180
India challenges the down grading of his Annual
Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the year 2013-14 and seeks
consequential reliefs.
Brief Facts
2. Shorn ... Respondent No. 2 vide letter dated 6 th August
2014 conveyed the APAR for the year 2013-14 to the Petitioner wherein he
was downgraded
CBDT on the basis of highest marks allotted as per the ACR / APAR, the panel is prepared by arranging the selected officers in the order ... same for 3 broad reasons. (i) The official respondents have adopted the APAR system for the year 2009-10 but supplied the ACR formats where
Apar Industries Ltd. vs Natwarsinh Naharsinh Sindha on 26 September, 2003
Equivalent citations: (2003)3GLR2701, (2004)IILLJ282GUJ
Author: P.B. Majmudar
Bench: P.B. Majmudar ... Apart Industries Limited and, therefore, they are required to be reinstated by Apar Industries Limited by paying benefits for the intervening period. The particulars about
assessments and remarks in their Annual Performance Appraisal Reports ( for short, 'APARs'), for different periods in the instant case at hand ... pleaded case of the petitioners that the copies of the APARs were made available in the Month of December, 2012, in response to application
year 1991-92 considering 7 out of 7 outstanding/very good APARs are concerned, and the respondents are directed to show the names of merit ... subject to review/revision on the basis of 5 out of 7 APARs as against the vacancies of 1992-93. The criteria of merit promotion
Vide Office Memorandum dated 14.5.2009 the
Government of India mandated that full APAR of an employee,
including the remarks of the reviewing/accepting Authority, were ... Manual.
LPA No 172/2019 Page 2 of 29
7. For the APAR year 2014-15 respondent submitted his goals and
targets through Online Performance
August, 2014 the Petitioner was
communicated his Annual Performance Appraisal Report („APAR‟) for the
period between 13th June, 2013 and 31st March ... APAR for the said
period, the Petitioner was given zero points against Column No. 3.1 (ii) and a
grading of 5.63 by the Reviewing Authority
requisite rules, petitioner being downgraded so far his Annual
Performance Appraisal Reports(APARs) are concerned etc etc.
9. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be granted ... 2015 came to
be filed by the petitioner because petitioner's APARs were downgraded and
if the down gradation of the petitioner would