Reporting Officer (2) Reviewing Officer and (3) Accepting Officer in the APAR format of ISS Officer from the APAR of 2011-12 onwards. The applicant ... aside the decision in Paragraph 5 of communication No. 12011/18/2009-APAR (ISS)- Pt. Dated 05.03.2012 (Annexure: A-1) to introduce the System
adverse remarks recorded by the reporting officer on 19.02.2013 in his APAR for the period 22.07.2011 to 17.02.2012, and giving him overall grading ... maintained the grading given by the reporting officer in the APAR for the aforesaid period.
2. The applicant has sought the following main relief
rejecting his representation against the below benchmark grading in his ACR/APAR for 2006-07 (1.8.2006 to 31.3.2007) and year ... peruse the same;
(b) Declare the Office Memorandum No.12011/33/10-APAR(ISS) dated 25.8.2010 (Annexure-A Impugned) and the ACRs
impugning five orders issued by the respondents bearing No.106/8/DGDE/APAR/2010/44/ PC-1;No.106/8/DGDE/APAR/2010 ... DGDE/APAR/2010/44/PC-3; No.106/8/DGDE/APAR/ 2010/44/PC-4 & No.106/8/DGDE/ APAR/ 2010
below benchmark grading and adverse remarks in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR for short) for the period from 01.04.2012 to 31.07.2012 (Annexure ... Memorandum dated 16.12.2013, he was informed about the adverse entries in his APAR for the period from 01.04.2012 to 31.07.2012 inviting representation, if any, against
below benchmark grading and adverse remarks in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR for short) for the period from 17.05.2013 to 16.11.2013 communicated ... vide order dated 16.12.2010. On 03.02.2014, he was communicated APAR for the period 2013-14 (from 17.05.2013 to 16.11.2013) inviting representation, if any, against
Reporting Officer (2) Reviewing Officer and (3)
Accepting Officer in the APAR format of ISS Officer from the
APAR of 2011-12 onwards. The applicant ... aside the decision in
Paragraph 5 of communication No.
12011/18/2009-APAR (ISS)- Pt. Dated
05.03.2012 (Annexure: A-1) to introduce
the System
Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act,
1985 assailing the below benchmark APAR for the year
2011-12, has prayed for the following relief ... respondent Ministry seeking his representation against the
adverse and below benchmark APAR for the year 2011-
2012 to which he submitted a comprehensive
representation
adverse remarks and below benchmark grading in his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the period from 01.11.2012 to 04.02.2013.
2. The applicant has prayed ... became his reviewing officer. The applicant submitted his self-appraisal of APAR for the period 01.11.2012 to 04.02.2013 to the reporting officer on 14.05.2013 despite
21011/1/2010 Estt A dated 13.04.2010, 6 APAR/ACR of the
applicant, below bench mark were made available to him to
enable ... have been rejected on account of wrong
projection of factual information regarding
APAR/ACR profile.
2. On the other hand, learned counsels for respondents
could
