V.J.Xavier vs Union Of India Represented By Secretary on 14 August, 2015
decision taken by the CIFNET vide their
letter No.5.1.2010-APAR dated 17.2.2011 appears to be in order. Applicant
submits that Annexure
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.82 seconds)P. Vijayakumar vs Union Of India on 8 October, 2015
taken to get the deficiencies rectified in
respect of shortfall in ACRs/APARs/Vigilance/cadre clearance etc.
from the concerned departments of the candidates. Thereafter
Rasheed.K.I vs Union Of India on 4 August, 2015
interim direction of the
Tribunal required calling for fresh vigilance clearances/APARs of the
applicants who had the benefit of the interim directions. This
K. Muraleedharan vs The Chief Commissioner Of Central ... on 7 October, 2015
physical endurance test. Annexure. A8 series makes it
clear that the APAR of the applicant for the relevant period was Very Good
and Outstanding. Therefore ... eligibility and his
performance was outstanding or very good according to the APAR, it is
inconceivable what is the other ground on which the applicant
1