Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 127 (0.53 seconds)

Ram Roop Kanaujia vs Union Of India on 20 September, 2013

quashing of entries in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report (for brevity APAR) communicated to him vide letter dated 17.09.2009 (Annexure A-1), as also ... their communication dated 17.09.2009 (Annexure A-1) forwarded his entries in his APAR for the reporting year 2008-2009 and called upon the applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Sharma vs M/O Mines on 16 May, 2024

receiving adverse grading for the period April, 2012 to March 2013. The APAR was supplied to the applicant vide letter dated 13.02.2017. Prior to recording ... explain his conduct, failing with adverse entries cannot be endorsed in the APAR dossier of the applicant. The entire performance and potential profile
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Sharma vs M/O Mines on 16 May, 2024

receiving adverse grading for the period April, 2012 to March 2013. The APAR was supplied to the applicant vide letter dated 13.02.2017. Prior to recording ... explain his conduct, failing with adverse entries cannot be endorsed in the APAR dossier of the applicant. The entire performance and potential profile
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Sharma vs M/O Mines on 16 May, 2024

receiving adverse grading for the period April, 2012 to March 2013. The APAR was supplied to the applicant vide letter dated 13.02.2017. Prior to recording ... explain his conduct, failing with adverse entries cannot be endorsed in the APAR dossier of the applicant. The entire performance and potential profile
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Sharma vs M/O Mines on 16 May, 2024

receiving adverse grading for the period April, 2012 to March 2013. The APAR was supplied to the applicant vide letter dated 13.02.2017. Prior to recording ... explain his conduct, failing with adverse entries cannot be endorsed in the APAR dossier of the applicant. The entire performance and potential profile
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pallavi Tandon vs Union Of India on 12 September, 2013

been given Good grading in her Annual Performance Appraisal Report (for brevity APAR) for the year 2008-2009 (01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009). Since this is below ... Limited Board, against the adverse entries and final grading given in this APAR. However, her representation has been rejected vide the order dated 06.05.2010 (Annexure
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next