marks
given to the petitioner in her Annual Performance Appraisal Report
('APAR') and consequently directing that, 'the respondent shall consider
the effect ... after having served for four years with "excellent
performance" in APAR, the petitioner became eligible for consideration
in the DPC, to the next
including
memos, show-cause notices, charge-sheets, penalties, Annual Performance
Appraisal Report (APAR's for short) grading, remarks about integrity and general
reputation ... Staff Regulation. Moreover, as
per the petitioner's APAR's assessment prior to 2009, he had earned grading of
fair/ good
petitioner in
accessing him/improving upon the
overall grade in APAR for the period
13.08.2019 to 31.03.2020 and thereby
partially allowed the representation
dated ... petitioner
within a period of three months and for
quashing of APAR of the petitioner for
the period 13.08.2019 to 31.03.2020 to
extent where initiating
adverse remarks and below
benchmark grading in his Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (APARs)
WP(C) No. 1607/2023 Page 1 of 1
2025:JKLHC ... adverse
remarks and below benchmark grading in his Annual Performance
Appraisal Report (APAR) for the year 2018-19 has been rejected.
b) An appropriate writ
requirement of passing any
speaking orders. He argued that all the APARs of the petitioner
pertaining to the five years prior to his retirement ... basis of adverse remarks/entries made in petitioner's APARs of 2012-
13,2013-14,2014-15 and 2015-16 and also considering
writ
of certiorari quashing Order No. R.XIII.27/2019-DA-13/(APAR)
dated 14.02.2020 issued by Respondent No. 2 whereby the
representation dated ... filed by the petitioner against
Grading/Remarks in the APAR 2018-19 given by respondents 3
and 4, has been rejected, being totally illegal
grading in his Annual/Part Performance
Appraisal Report (for short, 'APAR') for the year 2018-19 as also the
punishments of severe reprimand ... above punishments, however, again to no avail. Instead in the
Impugned APAR for the period 2018-19, the following adverse
remarks along with an overall
2012 &
07/07/2012 & scrutiny of SRS & APARs, punishment and awards
etc. conducted on 03/08/2012, in which the name ... submits that the
..𝓐..
Judgment 6 16wp4685.24.odt
entries in the APARs of the Petitioner for the years
Surendra Kumar And Others vs Apar Distt.Magistrate/D.D.C.Hardoi ... on 4 September, 2025
Author: Alok Mathur
Bench: Alok Mathur
HIGH COURT ... Surendra Kumar And Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Apar Distt.Magistrate/D.D.C.Hardoi And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s): Chandra Has Misra
whereby the petitioner's representation regarding alleged arbitrary
marking in his APAR for the year 2010-2011 has been rejected. The petitioner
also seeks ... writ of mandamus directing the respondents to treat the said APAR
as non-existent and to reconsider his eligibility for promotion on the basis
