under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
report is attached with
any of the documents.
20. The Operational Creditor has relied on a document titled
'details of payment'(attached ... position in the operational
creditor company. This document is also not apostilled.
26. Appellant Rishima has raised the issue of collusion between
corporate debtor
this document there was another document dated 04.12.2017
filed by the Operational Creditor with tittle "TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY
CONCERN". The document ... SCCOnline Cal
4414 to argue that unless the document executed in a Foreign Country is
apostilled, the same cannot be accepted in evidence. Perusal
interest in M/s
Flovel. Further, the French Liquidator issued official proceedings
apostilled on 14.10.2021 authorizing Mr. Satvir Singh Sorot, an
Indian National holding Indian ... signed and issued following documents:
a. Official Proceedings of the judicial liquidator of M/s Mecamidi
S.A. as apostilled on 14.10.2021 Authorising and appointing
country.
8. Having heard counsel for both sides and having perused the documents
we find the respondents standing on technicalities and we find that there ... attorney on that date in favour of Bharat Modi. No doubt the documents got
technically complete on 28th June, 2017 but for this mere technicality
