reject the
instrument of trust and/or other duly notarised and apostilled documents ... That the Lower Authorities have erred in overlooking the duly
apostilled/notarized documents received from the relevant foreign parties,
prior to the BMA Act coming
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
under Section 5(21) of the Code. It is also alleged that documents
submitted vide mail dated 02.09.2024 and 06.09.2024 support their
contention that ... Respondent No. 2 with the advice to
submit the notarized/apostilled documents in due course which were hand
delivered on 20.08.2024. The CoC was constituted
bank, he did nothing and therefore he also submitted "Apostilled
Document" issued by the United Kingdom Government. However, the
bank even then turn ... abolishing the
requirement of further legalization of foreign public documents that
are already Apostilled. Despite this the bank has rejected the
complainant‟s request
said documents, informed the Embassy of India at Switzerland that the letter dated
08.12.2006 (supra) and the accompanying documents are forged documents. In
justification ... liable for
admission, so that admission thereof is rejected.
A document, even if not apostilled, could be, for the reasons stated, admitted.
However, an unsigned
report is attached with
any of the documents.
20. The Operational Creditor has relied on a document titled
'details of payment'(attached ... position in the operational
creditor company. This document is also not apostilled.
26. Appellant Rishima has raised the issue of collusion between
corporate debtor
