Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.01 seconds)

K Rajkumar vs M/O Railways on 10 June, 2025

concerned General Managers to appoint Act Apprentices accordingly. In line with these directives, approximately 2,200 Act Apprentices, including around 1,000 from ICF, were ... course-completed Act Apprentices. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has also held that trained apprentices are to be given preference over direct recruits. However
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

B Durairaj vs M/O Railways on 16 February, 2024

Centre for Handicapped, in the year 1991 itself. The applicant completed the Apprentice and Technical Training, at the Electrical Workshop of the Southern Railway, Perambur ... Apprentice at Electrical Workshop - Perambur - Chennai, from 31.10.1994 to 30.10.1997. During the year 2006, it was decided to engage the course completed Act Apprentice
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Balamurugan vs Southern Railway on 5 January, 2023

filed a rejoinder along with extract of the Section 22 of the Apprentice Act, Para 134 & 135 of IREM 1968 edition. The applicant also ... Letters dated 17.01.1969, 24.02.1979, 26.08.1996, & offer of appointment issued to an Apprentice on 26.12.1997 in support of his contention. 5. Heard both sides
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Ramakrishnan vs M/O Railways on 18 February, 2019

marks in the written test for selection to the post of Intermediate Apprentice Mechanic/Mechanical under the 25% serving employees quota for the years ... this process, the claim of the applicant to be selected in preference to his seniors, the private respondents herein on the strength of his securing
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next