apprentices, but he could not distinguish the
duties and responsibilities between the regular workmen and the
trainees or apprentices, the wages and stipend paid ... apprentices and
avoidance of contribution.
8. On the other hand, Ex.P.29 reads the terms and conditions
of engaging apprentices and the stipend paid
modus operandi of the
employer by showing the employees as apprentices. The alleged
apprentices have not undergone regular and fixed periods of
training ... those persons were not apprentices but
employees. Apprentice leaving the training may be due to various
reasons. After joining the apprentice training, they might
post of FRO much
before the recruitment of the petitioners as Forest Apprentice in the year 2014
and, therefore, they have no locus to question ... petitioners that they were
appointed as Forest Apprentice and more particularly, they were paid stipend
and that they were not paid any time scale
post of FRO much
before the recruitment of the petitioners as Forest Apprentice in the year 2014
and, therefore, they have no locus to question ... petitioners that they were
appointed as Forest Apprentice and more particularly, they were paid stipend
and that they were not paid any time scale
post of FRO much
before the recruitment of the petitioners as Forest Apprentice in the year 2014
and, therefore, they have no locus to question ... petitioners that they were
appointed as Forest Apprentice and more particularly, they were paid stipend
and that they were not paid any time scale
Apprentices.
(b) The apprentices are not covered under the scheme of the Act, since section 2(f) of the Act excludes apprentices.
(c) Apprentices have ... paid stipends.
(d) The settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act has been entered into with the apprentices.
4.The second respondent
were shown either as contract workers supplied by others or as trainees/apprentices/probationers, but also the absence of list of trainers and the failure ... According to the appellants, such deductions would not be made from the stipend of the trainees and the very fact that such deductions were made
D.Sathiya Narayanan vs Presiding Officer
W.P.Nos.33573 to 33580 of 2014
IN
