April 1998 to March 2003
contribution has not been paid towards apprentice stipend. Based upon
the said inspection report, a show cause notice under Form ... Apprentice Application in Form 2 from its
apprentices. A perusal of the said applications will also disclose that
those persons have been appointed as apprentices
makes it clear that apprentice appointed under Apprentice Act, 1961 and
apprentices appointed under the standing order of the establishment were
exempted. The learned counsel ... person engaged as an apprentice, not being an
apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961),
or under the standing order
apprentice stipend payment abstract for the month of April 2022 filed
along with the inspection report, it is clear that, they have paid
conveyance allowance ... second
respondents, which order, on a perusal reveals that the apprentice stipend
payment abstract for the month of April 2022 was taken into account,
which
April 2004 to March 2007 towards the omitted wages of stipend
paid to the apprentices. After affording opportunity to the management,
the provisional order ... work of the establishment;
(ii).engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice
engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 ( 52 of 1961) or under
apprentices engaged under the
Apprentices Act 1961 and the apprentices engaged under the Standing
Order of an establishment are completely exempted from the coverage ... hours
they have worked and not on monthly stipend basis. The report further
reveals that the apprentices are engaged in all shifts including the
Sunday
apprentices on the ground that the management has not
produced any records to show number of apprentices engaged by them,
the alleged stipend paid ... learned counsel appearing for
the appellant that the stipend paid to the apprentices cannot be counted
for the purpose of calculating wages or contribution
years old and working
as an apprentice in L.G.Balakrishnan and Brothers Limited, thereby
receiving a stipend of Rs.12,500/-. The Tribunal failed ... petitioner was earning a sum of Rs.12,500/- as stipend as an apprentice.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page
doing the
production job directly. According to the petitioner, the term company
apprentice was misnomer and it was assigned to him only to deny ... company apprentice' under the
company's certified standing order on 14.11.2002. As per the appointment
order, the petitioner was paid consolidated stipend
work of the establishment
2) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged
under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961) or under ... draft standing orders even after a period of 10 years. The stipend
given to the trainees is termed as “basic wages” in terms of Section
order dated 12.12.2005, the first respondent was enrolled as an
apprentice in the petitioner company for a period of 18 months. It was made
clear ... vide orders dated 11.6.2007, 11.12.2007
and 11.6.2008. He was also paid the stipend. Even thereafter, as the
performance was not found satisfactory, vide letter dated
