Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 810 (0.76 seconds)

Ch. Ramakoteswar Rao vs General Manager, Apsrtc, Hyderabad And ... on 12 June, 2000

disciplinary enquiry was conducted against him for misconduct under Clauses (xviii), (xxi) and (xxvii) of Regulation 28 of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963 (fhe Regulations ... which is a serious, misconduct under Regulation 28 (xviii) of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963. (2) For having abused and used very vulgar language against
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

G Ravi vs The State Of Ap on 7 October, 2023

Pradesh Ordinance No.4 of 2023 dated 26.06.2023, APSRTC Employees (Service) Regulations, 1964, APSRTC Employees‟ (Conduct) Regulations, 1963 and APSRTC Employees‟ (CC&A) Regulations ... conditions, as envisaged under the APSRTC Regulations i.e. APSRTC Employees (Service) Regulations, 1964, APSRTC Employees‟ (Conduct) Regulations, 1963 and APSRTC Employees
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Depot Manager vs Bolly Ramchander on 5 August, 2019

such conduct of the respondent-writ petitioner certainly constitutes misconduct in terms of Regulation 28 (x) of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963. It was also ... this conduct of the respondent-writ petitioner also certainly constitutes misconduct in terms of Regulation 28 (xxxii) of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963. Further
Telangana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Akther - Full Document

M. Koteswara Rao vs Apsrtc, Tirupati And Ors. on 17 April, 1997

urgent work, which constitutes misconduct under Regulation 28 (xxxii) of APSRTC. Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1963; Charge No. 2 : For your insubordination and misbehaviour with ... which constitutes misconduct under Regulation 28 (viii) and (xxi) of APSRTC Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1963; Charge No. 3 : For having caused obstruction to attend
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 10 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next