protection of life and personal liberty. It ensures certain safeguards against arbitrary deprivation of life and liberty. Article 21 asserts that no person shall ... must be fair, just, and reasonable, and it cannot be arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable. In Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985), the court recognized
laws exhibits a positive content of Article 14.” The doctrine of Anti Arbitrariness: The scope of article 14 was drastically increased by the Supreme Court ... court said that Article 14 gives a guarantee against the arbitrary actions of the State. The Right to Equality is against arbitrariness. They both
Supreme Court. Court decided that the act made by the government is arbitrary and does not fall under the reasonable restrictions. The Hon’ble Supreme
authorities. Protection against Arrest and Detention - Article 22 safeguards individuals against arbitrary arrest and detention. It ensures that no person can be arrested or detained
lawful to do so; but the discretion of the court is not arbitrary but sound and reasonable, guided by judicial principles and capable of correction
except by the authority of law. It provides protection to individuals against arbitrary deprivation of their property by the state. It ensures that
principles of fairness, protection against self-incrimination, and the prevention of arbitrary or excessive punishment. It's important to note that these protections are applicable
adultery as defined under Section 497 of the IPC as being manifestly arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of the dignity of a woman and therefore, unconstitutional
laws exhibits a positive content of Article 14.” The doctrine of Anti Arbitrariness: The scope of article 14 was drastically increased by the Supreme Court ... court said that Article 14 gives a guarantee against the arbitrary actions of the State. The Right to Equality is against arbitrariness. They both
expressions used in Section 66A were open-ended, undefined and therefore arbitrary. The definition of offense under this section was vague. It was so broadly
