Arbitration Petition No.
427 of 2013 [the earlier Section 34 petition] under Section 34 of the
Arbitration Act. In the said petition, respondent ... parties, Section 42 of the Arbitration Act would be
applicable only if an application inter alia under Section 9 or under
Section 34 is made
interferred
with by the Court either under Section 34 or under Section 37 of the
Arbitration Act.
35. It is submitted by the learned counsel ... disclose any error warranting any interference under Section
34 or Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.
54. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that after
interferred
with by the Court either under Section 34 or under Section 37 of the
Arbitration Act.
35. It is submitted by the learned counsel ... disclose any error warranting any interference under Section
34 or Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.
54. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that after
interferred
with by the Court either under Section 34 or under Section 37 of the
Arbitration Act.
35. It is submitted by the learned counsel ... disclose any error warranting any interference under Section
34 or Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.
54. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that after
interferred
with by the Court either under Section 34 or under Section 37 of the
Arbitration Act.
35. It is submitted by the learned counsel ... disclose any error warranting any interference under Section
34 or Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.
54. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that after
Commercial Arbitration" within the
meaning of section 2(1)(f) of the Arbitration Act. She relied upon
Explanation 2 to section 34 ... APPL4901 OF 2020.doc
to domestic arbitration in International Commercial Arbitration
contrary to section 34 (2A) of the Arbitration Act.
36. Learned counsel placed reliance
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the
Arbitration Act ") seeking to adjourn the above Section 34
Petition in order to permit ... approaches the Court under
Section 34 to challenge a valid Award. That would be
preposterous. Every Petition under Section 34 proceeds on the
basis that
Section 3-G(2) of the Act of 1956.
(4) The acquiring body preferred applications
under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act before the
District ... here that the land
owners did not file applications under Section 34 of the
Arbitration Act, but instead preferred applications under
Order 41 Rule
Section 3-G(2) of the Act of 1956.
(4) The acquiring body preferred applications
under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act before the
District ... here that the land
owners did not file applications under Section 34 of the
Arbitration Act, but instead preferred applications under
Order 41 Rule
Section 3-G(2) of the Act of 1956.
(4) The acquiring body preferred applications
under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act before the
District ... here that the land
owners did not file applications under Section 34 of the
Arbitration Act, but instead preferred applications under
Order 41 Rule
