withdraw any recognition and it was contrary to
terms of the Architects Act of 1972. For any defect or deficiencies noted
by the Council ... order and has made pointed reference
to Section 14(1) of the Architects Act and the procedure prescribed
under Section 19(2) to state that
read as under:-
(i) Letter dated 28.8.1973
"CHIEF ARCHITECT'S UNIT
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE
TOWN HALL: NEW DELHI
NO.CA/2963 ... detailed in the statement attached herewith.
Sd/-
(MANSINGH M. RANA)
CHIEF ARCHITECT"
(ii) Letter dated 19.12.1973
"CHIEF ARCHITECT'S UNIT
NEW DELHI
course. In the matter of the said agreement the petitioner's architects Messrs. Ballardie, Thompson and Matthews acted as the agent of the petitioner ... running bills submitted by the respondent on the certificate of the said architects in terms of the said agreement. In 1956 the Life Insurance Corporation
grant renewal of Registration of the petitioners permitting them to act as Architects.The petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ to quash ... renewal fee as per the provisions of Section 23(3) of the Architects Act, 1972.
3. The petitioners, young lady architects, were conferred a Degree
plans for construction of a house at Margao signed by an Architect registered with it and not by an Engineer. The issue and the question ... directed her to re-submit her application and plans signed by an Architect registered with it and not by an Engineer as required
partner of a registered firm of Chartered Architects. The firm of the petitioner terminated the services of one T.M. Lingam, an employee, after issuing ... contending that as the firm was carrying on a profession of Consulting Architects, it could not be classified as a shop or an establishment within
basis that the Third Party had
engaged the services of a professional architect for designing the layout plans, elevation, etc and paid the
architect ... violative of the fiduciary relationship between the Third Party and the architect. The Third
Party also contended that the sanction plan(s) submitted
issuing the stop work notice, the respondent No.4
called upon the Architect of respondent No.5 to
produce original copy of the approved plan ... respondent No.2 dated 19th November 1992 on the
application of the architect of Smt.Kalavati Desai
from whom respondent No.5 claims to have
rates for the electrical works of the
whole building issued by the architect the claimant expressed his interest and
made tentative offer to architect ... Gurgaon office,
the claimant raised the Running Account Bills to the said architect (TAG) for
approval and the said architect on behalf of the Bata
breach of the Agreement by its failure to appoint an
Architect as provided under Clause 3 of the Collaboration Agreement
dated 21.08.1985. The counsel submits ... that the petitioner not only
delayed approaching the Architects but also thereafter there was no
clarity as to whether Jasbir Sachdeva of Sachdeva Eggleston, Architect
