respondent appointed M/s.
A Sharma Associates (in short 'Architect') and M/s. Swati
Structures Solutions Pvt. Ltd. as a Consultant (in short ... from 17.11.2011 till May, 2013
neither respondent nor PMC or Architect appointed by respondent
had raised any objections that the petitioner has delayed the
execution
schedule.
The said work also got verified by the defendant's Architect from
Architect M/s Planners India, New Delhi. The total cost ... were sanctioned by the defendant. Despite
the fact that defendant's architect had visited and verified the
work twice, the remaining payment along-with
successful
specifications of TECU Patina sheets in the
tender documents through an Architect in
Delhi were undertaken by the Plaintiff firm
in September, 2005. From ... Defendant dated
03.08.2005 as Ex.PW1/9.
10. The plaintiff sent Architect's drawings
showing the installation and asked the
Defendant to fabricate
done by the plaintiff as per the satisfaction of defendant. The
architect supervising the said project of defendant i.e. M/s Manpreet
Batra ... that the meeting
between the parties was held at the Office of Architect in Delhi. He has
also tendered initial quotation dated
done by the plaintiff as per the satisfaction of defendant. The
architect supervising the said project of defendant i.e. M/s Manpreet
Batra ... that the meeting
between the parties was held at the Office of Architect in Delhi. He has
also tendered initial quotation dated
defendants in the month of July 2011 as verified by their Architect
and the balance payment of Rs.2,39,849/- is still ... defendants have only approved Rs.3,34,500/- as verified by their
Architect. But only an amount of Rs.2,45,000/- was paid
submitted that the plaintiff was referred to the defendant
by one Architect Ashwani Tayal.
20. It is submitted that the work done by the plaintiff ... between the parties that
entire bills were to be cleared by the Architect and his
satisfaction will be deemed to be the satisfaction
engaged the service of the plaintiff on the
recommendation of his Architect Sh. Hitesh Chadha and the
construction work was to be done at plots ... stated that bills were
submitted by the plaintiff to Sh. Hitesh Chadha, Architect and the
defendant has, from time to time, made the payments
Akanksha Architect vs State Bank Of India on 21 August, 2025
IN THE COURT OF SH. SANDEEP YADAV,
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL)-03, SOUTH,
SAKET COURTS ... DELHI
CS DJ 1026/2018
M/s. Akanksha Architect
Through Mr. Devinder Gupta
Plot No. 89-90, Shop No. 1-2
Nehru Market, Badarpur
defendants have also stated that as per the report of
architect, total cost of construction was Rs. 19,25,974.48paise/-, but
the plaintiff ... copy of his
Aadhar Card Ex. DW-1/A and report of Architect already
CS (COMM) 388/23 SHRI AKHTAR ALI VS. SHRI SHYAM
