would reveal that the applicant was appointed on regular basis as Architectural Draftsman on 12.07.1988 and completed five years of continuous service in the same ... Even though the position of the applicant in seniority list of Architectural Draftsman is at serial no.1 and despite the fact that he fulfilled
Block,
Maharishi Dayanand Marg,
Gopal Nagar, Najafgarh,
Delhi-110043
Post - Architecture Draftsman
College - Siri Fort ITI
2
OA 1339/2020
5. Ms. Pragya
Block,
Maharishi Dayanand Marg,
Gopal Nagar, Najafgarh,
Delhi-110043
Post - Architecture Draftsman
College - Siri Fort ITI
2
Item
give him consequential promotion to the post of Draftsman
Grade I and thereafter to Architectural Assistant.
2. It is the contention of the applicant that ... regular service of 5
years in the post of Draftsman Grade I is necessary for
Architectural Assistant whereas, as per the applicant
himself he would
during the year 2006, 2007, 2008,
2009 & 2010 for Engineers / Architectural Assistant / Draftsman. The ACPIO replied on
24.5.10 stating that information has not been
having officers from Civil, Electrical, Architecture and
Horticulture wing. In addition there are various other cadres i.e
Ministerial Draftsman, Stenographers, official language etc. Being
having officers from Civil, Electrical, Architecture and
Horticulture wing. In addition there are various other cadres i.e
Ministerial Draftsman, Stenographers, official language etc. Being
Planning and Architecture. However, he did not qualify the said test and, therefore, he is not entitled for the post of Architect Draftsman. Hence
Jhasi Development Authority, Jhansi vs Dy. C.I.T., Circle-4, Agra on 13 January
Sri Mahalakshmi Housing, Chennai vs Assessee on 29 January, 2010
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE
