Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.40 seconds)

Da vs . Sunil Kumar Page 1/32 on 1 February, 2016

Rules 1955 because sample shows presence of argemone oil. Accordingly after obtaining the necessary Sanction / Consent under Section 20 of the Act, the present complaint ... Rules 1955 because sample showed presence of argemone oil. 5. In pre charge evidence, the prosecution examined one witness i.e. Sh. Satish Kumar Gupta
Delhi District Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

In Re vs A-1) Mali Ram on 25 October, 2016

conforming to the standards on the ground that it showed presence of argemone oil. Upon receipt of report, the SDM/LHA ordered investigation which ... dated 14.06.1999, opining the sample to be adulterated due to presence of argemone oil. 4. Subsequently, an application under section
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next