appearing in Rule 14(2) of the Army Rules has not been defined either in the Army Act or the Rules framed there under. That ... appearing in Rule 14(2) of the Army Rules have not been defined in the Army Act or the Rules framed there under, the said
Regiment on 15.7.1990; was
charged under Section 41(2) of the Army Act for disobeying a lawful command
given by a superior officer in that ... Army Act; and (ii) for committing act
prejudicial to good order and military discipline (consuming liquor) under
Section 63 of the Army Act
features of Territorial Army and regular army
are significant in the present case. As per Army Order 77/1984, the
Territorial Army is a part ... attached to any portion of the
regular army for active duty, then the Territorial Army Act 1948 governs
the service conditions and this
investigation, the petitioner was tried by a General Court Martial under Army Act Section 53(a) on six charges for committing extortion. The charges ... which he was tried are as follows:
First Charge COMMITTING EXtorTION Army Act Sectin 53(a) in that he, at field, between
short) on the following two distinct charges:
FIRST CHARGE ARMY ACT SECTION 52(f).
SUCH AN OFFENCE AS IS MENTIONED IN
CLAUSE (f) OF SECTION ... ARMY
ACT, WITH INTENT TO CAUSE WRONGFUL
LOSS TO A PERSON
In that he, at field on 30th Jul 92, with intent
to cause wrongful
offences punishable under Section 39(b) and 48 of the Army Act for overstaying leave and for intoxication and sentenced to undergo imprisonment ranging from ... Army Act empowers the competent authority to retire, release or discharge from service any person subject to the provisions of the said Act. Army Rule
respondent and thereby committed a breach of Section 44 of the Army Act. He accordingly directed disciplinary action to be taken against the respondent ... from service in terms of Section 20(3) of the Army Act read with Rule 17 of the Army Rules. Aggrieved, the respondent filed
Field Regiment (Asal Uttar) under Section 39(a)(i) of the Army Act, 1950. Sentence of reduction of rank from Havildar to Sepoy was also ... that by virtue of provisions contained in Section 77 of the Army Act, 1950, the punishment of reduction in rank of the petitioner awarded
Chief of the Army staff on his statutory petition under Section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950 against the findings and sentence of summary ... Army Act Section 63 for 'an act prejudicial to good order and military discipline' and third charge was made under the Army Act
offences under Sections 41(i) , 39 (a)
and 63 of the Army Act was initiated against him. After completion of the
inquiry and on proved ... appellant preferred a statutory
complaint under Section 164 of the Army Act. The Central Government vide
Order dated 17.08.1994 commuted the punishment modifying
