comply with Army Rule 22 and may direct recording of a summary of evidence in compliance with Army Rule 23 to 25.
It is noteworthy ... procedure laid down in Army Rule 22 has been duly followed, other steps as provided in Army Rules 23 and 24, shall be complied with
Ram Padarath Singh vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal ... on 22 October, 2014
Summary of Evidence was then recorded by the Officer
as per Army Rule 23. Apart from cross-examining the prosecution witness, the petitioner
called seven ... hearing of charge under Army Rule 22
was made. CO ordered recording of Summary Evidence in terms of Army Rule 23. It was,
thus, recorded
Army Act, 1950 and Rule 14 (2) of the Army, Rules,
1954; being ultra vires to Section 71 of Army Act,
1950 and Article ... Section 19 of the Army Act read with
Rule 14 (2) of the Army Rules as per Army Headquarters Letter
dated 30/09/2003
Army Act, 1950 and Rule 14 (2) of the Army, Rules,
1954; being ultra vires to Section 71 of Army Act,
1950 and Article ... Section 19 of the Army Act read with
Rule 14 (2) of the Army Rules as per Army Headquarters Letter
dated 30/09/2003
Army Act, 1950 and Rule 14 (2) of the Army, Rules,
1954; being ultra vires to Section 71 of Army Act,
1950 and Article ... Section 19 of the Army Act read with
Rule 14 (2) of the Army Rules as per Army Headquarters Letter
dated 30/09/2003
Section 193 the rules as well as regulations have to be published in the Official Gazette. Such rules called Army Rules are made ... Rules provides for investigation of charges and remand for trial and power of Commanding Officers. Rule 22 provides for the hearing of charges. Rule 23
Officer may, at his
discretion, proceed as described in
Army Rule 22(2) or Army Rule 22(3).
3. It may be clarified that ... procedure laid down in
Army Rule 22 has been duly
followed, other steps as provided
in Army rules 23 to 25, shall be
followed both
Army Act, 1950. Summary
of Evidence was recorded under Rule 23, Army Rules and the Respondent was
tried by Summary Court Martial (SCM), headed ... Certificate, issued under Section 23 read with
Rule 12, being the conclusive step of the discharge proceedings, cannot
therefore stand.
23 The ostensible order
September,
1981 was in compliance with Army Rules 23(1), 23(2), 23(3),
23(4) and 23(6) in which the appellant did confess ... proceedings held by GCM were inconsistent with the
provisions of the Army Act and the finding of the Court-Martial
was not in accordance with
